Tacoma News Tribune
Bridge bailout exacts too high a toll

I’ve thought hard about the direct impact that issues of taxes and tolls have on my constituents’ economic realities. That’s why I’m disappointed to see The News Tribune, in a March 8 editorial, applaud the passage of House Bill 2990, which requires more toll increases and additional loans for the Tacoma Narrows Bridge. At the heart of HB 2990 is an attempt to create a long-term fix to the escalating debt payments on the bridge. Under the legislation, the state loans the Tacoma Narrows Bridge account $85 million, a 25-cent toll increase is authorized beginning in 2022, and tolling is extended beyond the current 2032 end date until the loan is paid off. I opposed the bill because I think this is a bad deal for our region, despite all the good intention behind it. No one disagrees that we need a solution to the financing set up for the bridge, which was flawed from the beginning. When the new bridge opened in 2007, it was financed by general obligation bonds that would be repaid over time in increasing amounts through the collection of tolls. Years of lower-than-forecast toll revenue and increasing debt payments have created an unsustainable course requiring more and more toll increases. To fill the gap, the Legislature has on multiple occasions taken steps to prevent toll increases. I voted in favor of such efforts twice – once in 2016 and again in 2017. In order to develop a long-term solution, a bipartisan legislative work group on which I served came up with a plan: Transfer $125 million of non-toll state funding towards paying off the debt each year and prohibit any and all further toll increases. Instead of bad loans, our community would get its fair share and help deal with a critical economic lifeline for our region. As a result, I sponsored a bill, HB 2834, that would have implemented that clean and simple fix. Unfortunately, the Legislature moved forward with HB 2990 instead of the work group’s recommendation and HB 2834. Searching for a long-term solution instead of year-by-year fixes is a worthy cause, and one that I’ve supported as well. For that reason, I very much respect my colleagues in their work on this issue, but raising tolls and extending the number of years they’ll be collected doesn’t feel like a winning solution to me. As we look to repair and maintain public roads, bridges and highways throughout our region, I believe Pierce County taxpayers deserve a solution that involves a significant state investment, not an additional $85 million in debt to be repaid. I promised voters that I’d take tough stands in their interest, and I remain committed to that principle. In Olympia, I will continue to stand up against toll and tax increases that unfairly burden our residents – even if that means standing alone.
State Rep. Christine Kilduff, D-University Place, represents Washington's 28th Legislative District. Reach her by email at Christine.Kilduff@leg.wa.gov
Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/opinion/op-ed/article207233189.html#storylink=cpy
Read More

Our Voice: Not all legislators caved

By the Tri-City Herald Editorial Board February 26, 2018 Last week, at political warp speed, the Legislature approved its own exemption to the state Public Records Act. Senate Bill 6617 was worked out quietly by leaders of the four legislative caucuses and rushed through within 48 hours of being introduced to lawmakers. The bill was … Continued

Dispatch News
Sound Transit’s car-tabs fee might be adjusted

"State legislators are talking about changing a funding formula for Sound Transit projects that a majority of voters in Pierce County don’t want but must pay for. Rep. Christine Kilduff, whose 28th Legislative District includes some of the Graham and Spanaway areas, began working with other legislators on a different plan after constituents received higher- than-expected fees for vehicle registrations and renewals, a staple of the projects’ current cash flow. Kilduff and other lawmakers from Pierce, Snohomish and King counties – the three-county area where Sound Transit has taxing authority -- are calling for, among other things, possible rebates for low-income constituents and relief from future fees that have been criticized as placing too high of a value on vehicles." … Read More